If democracy is so
important that we send our young to die in wars to defend it, why does any fool
or crook have a vote?
Why should the
selfish fool who flies a polluting private jet have the same vote as someone
who sacrifices all to cut CO2 emissions?
Why should a top
banker who receives a million pound bonus by virtue of tax payer bailouts have the
same vote as a pensioner whose savings were destroyed in the banking collapse?
Why should a tax
evading crook like Richard Branson even be allowed to vote?
Why should the vote
of a Trident submarine captain whose job is to comply with a command to destroy
the planet, without question, be the same as a gardener who job is to create
beauty from nothing?
These people were
not born bad, but became corrupted by a society which values individual success
above societal enhancement.
But most of us have
not risen to the great pinnacles of society and are simply struggling to
survive. In the face of runaway climate change, we are forced to prostitute ourselves
to industries we know are destroying our planet. Anyone working in the arms, oil,
car or travel industries along with many others do so in the knowledge that
their actions contribute to ecological collapse. To enhance their short term
prospects of survival they must be silent on this and vote for governments that
will maintain the status quo of destructive industrialisation.
The struggle for
survival in an industrial world corrupts us all. In so doing, we parallel the
Kapos in the German concentration camps. They were the jews that did the dirty
work the SS would not do. They pushed their brethren into the gas chambers and
took their dead bodies out. They did it knowing it was wrong, but it was the
only way they could survive and they had no choice in the matter. They also had
to hope for train loads of new victims to keep coming, because without these
they too would be destroyed.
In these
circumstances, giving the successful SS guards and the corrupted Kapos a vote
in the running of these nihilistic camps would never legitimise them. Yet we,
who have a similar struggle for survival, legitimise our government’s inaction
on climate change with our votes.
So for a government
to hold legitimacy, it must have a mandate from the people who are not corrupted
by either success or the struggles for survival.
These are our
youngsters. They are the group of people that have their morals mostly intact
and care for the future because they will inherit it. So, if we are serious
about democracy, the only group of people that should be allowed to vote are
the 16-21 year olds.
This would change
everything. General elections can still be held every 5 years, but political
parties would have to campaign on important long term issues such as climate
change, not on short term political advantage. Nor would they be able to
recklessly send our young people to war.
It means the
youngsters today, who are suffering from a plague of mental health issues as
they see their future prospects squandered by the powerful elder generation,
are put in the driving seat where they deserve to be.
We might then, just,
get governments that will act in the best interests of everyone and the planet.
1 comment:
Hi thanks for shariing this
Post a Comment