The collective schizophrenic madness

In 2012 I wrote the Vortex of Violence and why we are losing the war on climate change.

In it I warned that as climate change worsened, the collective response would be for everyone to work harder to deny, rather than to mitigate it. That is what is happening today, and it will only get worse. As part of this dynamic, I also warned that we would go collectively schizophrenically mad by having to do the things that we know we must not do. 

I believe the outbreak of transgender madness across the education systems of the West is a manifestation of this dynamic. 

In my case, I raised two safeguarding concerns at New College Swindon, one was for a student who wanted to present with an opposite sex persona and the other was for a teacher who wanted to encourage students to do so.  This set in motion a sequence of events that was to see me accused of safeguarding, and referred to the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and put on the Children's Barred List (CBL). The reasons given by the DBS for putting me on the CBL was because I was against the transitioning of children and for teaching scientific facts.

There is no doubt in my mind that we are firmly in the age of collective schizophrenic madness. The mistakes I made in the book not anticipating it happening so quickly and not thinking it would so directly affect me. 

So below is an update on my actions against the DBS:

The DBS were given to 12:00 noon,  24th Oct 2024, to remove me from the CBL but did not do so. I  therefore released all documentation. The minded to retain letter is at this link:

https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgVeu7kxoXyfh98liaAqsHBTCtdIMA?e=b3uLFs

My response is 250 pages of evidence addressing all the accusations the DBS and New College Swindon made against me to justify putting me on the CBL and retaining me on it.

The response is at this link: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgVeu7kxoXyfh-BLUSRVDKNoGDUm1w?e=c4gsJv

 A statement is at this link: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgVeu7kxoXyfh-FdAfk_r30kiDJvXQ?e=HhU74W

 My response demonstrates:

1. Evidence of the untrue nature of the claims Peta Fry (HR Director of New College Swindon) made to the DBS and which were accepted by the DBS as evidence that I had caused significant harm to a child.
   
   
2. Evidence of Carole Kitching (previous New College Swindon principal) making an untrue claim in a personal capacity to the DBS that I was risk to children.
   
   
3. Evidence of omissions that Peta Fry made in her referral to the DBS with the intent of making the referral untrue, and that the DBS ignored these when they were pointed out.
   
   
4. The speculative nature of all accusations against me and the lack of any evidence of harm.
   
   
5. The absence of any attempt by New College Swindon to ascertain the wishes and feelings of Student A when it was feasible to collect these.
   
   
6. The systemic nature of imposing the transgender ideology into UK education policy on the instructions of a minority group over the legitimate interests of the majority, and how this overrode safeguarding and how New College Swindon used this to avoid its own safeguarding obligations.
   
   
7. The safeguarding team at New College Swindon taking an adversarial approach to me by making me the central point of their investigations so they could enforce their interpretation of EDI, instead of keeping Student A as the central point.
   
   
8. New College Swindon’s violations of the Education Act 1996, s406 and s407 by enforcing ideological indoctrination, with the complicity of the Department for Education.

I will be instigating proceeding against those who made untrue claims to the DBS or supported others to do so.

The information is made available in the interests of Student A:

1. I have no idea how far she did or did not progress along the pathway towards adopting a male persona, but it is clear from the evidence that she was not given the safeguarding protection she deserved, and as a consequence of me raising my safeguarding concerns it became almost impossible for her to find an off-ramp.
   
   
2. The intent of making this information public is to give her the earliest access to the fullest evidence of the events should she want to seek damages for any harm she is now enduring. I will support her and her family in any way I can if they choose to do this and that will always be my main priority.