Following our correspondence, I am delighted to read in Executive Review of Travel that Flying Matters is to be wound up. I am sure you are having a hard time coming to terms with several wasted years of your career.
As you are hopefully aware we did report you to the Serious Fraud Office for the deliberately misleading claims that you made on your web site about the aviation industry being committed to reducing their CO2 emissions, when the opposite is clearly true. Hopefully you can look on the bright side of things and be thankful that you are only losing your job and reputation, rather than going to jail.
The winding up of Flying Matters, and with it your loss of job, will of course give you the opportunity to make amends and go public about how misleading the aviation claims are on climate change. I hope that you will take up this wonderful opportunity before it is too late.
Best wishes in your search for a more positive career move.
Kevin Lister
P.S. - after your previously unsuccessful attempt to join Airport Watch, you could now always try again, this time without using funny aliases.
1 comment:
1. Aviation should pay fuel duty. It places them at unfair advantage.
2. At London City Airport, they have created an Enterprise Zone (it was announced in the budget). London City Airport claims it brings so many jobs into the area, then why is it that you need to turn the area into an Enterprise Zone. Secondly, the Planning Rules in Enterprise Zones, means the answer the any planning application will be Yes. I am not sure it is applies to existing companies like airports, but it is not good news for the environment if companies can steam through planning applications without much restrictions.
Post a Comment